Peters Explanation: This is Like Joel 2. Acts 2:8-13, I Corinthians 13:12, Joel 2
These many different Jews are gathered in Jerusalem and they come from all over the Roman empire and also the east from the Parthian empire and Mesopotamia. All are there in Jerusalem and they are called "devout men" which indicates that at least for the most part the vast majority of them are believers in an Old Testament sense. This is why Old Testament theology is so crucial to understanding and properly interpreting Acts chapter two, because what is happening here is something that was promised in the Old Testament and it is related to this offer of the kingdom which John the Baptist offered and Jesus offered but the leadership rejected. We saw that in Matthew chapter twelve where there was the accusation that Jesus performed His miracles in the power of Beelzebub, a claim by the Pharisees and Sadducees that Jesus is not the Messiah, He is the emissary of the devil. This is the official rejection by the nation of Jesus' Messiahship. It doesn't mean that everybody in the nation rejected Him but the leadership has.
Acts 2:12 NASB "And they all continued in amazement and great perplexity, saying to one another, 'What does this mean?'" That is important because that is the question that Peter answers, and he is going to interpret for them the events that have just transpired. Why did they hear this loud sound? Why did they hear these disciples from Galilee speaking in these unlearned languages? The word "amazed" is an interesting word, the verb existemi [e)cisthmi] which is a cognate from the noun ekstasis [e)kstasij] from which we get our word "ecstasy." But this is one of those illustrations where just cognates and meanings don't give the real meaning of the word. We can see some elementary Greek student coming along and saying this was an ecstatic experience, but that is rarely how the word was used. It is certainly not how the verb was used. In the Old Testament the Greek word is never used for ecstasy—neither the verb nor the noun. In fact, the word is used primarily to express terror, fear or madness, and it is never used for some sort of mystical ecstatics. In the New Testament the verb most often describes the reaction of people to a miracle, to some marvellous work of God where they are amazed, astounded; almost speechless at what has happened because they understand that what has occurred is beyond the ordinary. So it has the idea of being amazed, confused or astonished at a set of circumstances. The second word used is the word "perplexed" which comes from another Greek word which means to be at loss for an explanation. They just can't explain it. They see something that is so out of the ordinary that they can't explain or understand it.
Acts 2:13 NASB "But others were mocking and saying, 'They are full of sweet [or new] wine.'" The word translated "sweet wine" there is the word gleukos [gleukoj] which refers to sweet wine. It was wine that had not yet fully fermented. Remember this was the first fruits of the summer harvest and so the vine harvest had not fully fermented yet, so there is a little bit of sarcasm going on here. They are mocking. gleukos was relatively inexpensive; it wasn't fully fermented wine yet. Peter is going to respond to them and say no, this isn't what you think.
Acts 2:14 NASB "But Peter, taking his stand with the eleven, raised his voice and declared to them: 'Men of Judea and all you who live in Jerusalem…" That phrase indicates two groups of people, Judeans, the natives who lived there in Judea, and the phrase "those who live in Jerusalem" isn't speaking of those who lived permanently in Jerusalem but it is the same Greek word that was used in 2:5 which referred to all the travellers who had come and were temporarily staying in Jerusalem. "…let this be known to you…" This is a somewhat questionable translation because it implies a passive voice, passive to the action of the verb. But that is not what is in the original where we have a present active imperative, indicating that the subject "you" performs the action of the verb. What Peter is saying is now you know this, or he is commanding them to know this. This is backed up by the second word that he uses which is enotizomai [e)nwtizomai], an aorist middle imperative, and it means to pay close attention to something. That is what "heed" means—"and give heed to my words." So what Peter says is, now you need to know this, pay attention to what I am going to say. He is going to explain what just happened.
It is really important to understand this because a failure to do so and to misinterpret this has led to great confusion in understanding eschatology, and it directly relates to our understanding of the kingdom. What we are going to see is that Peter is going to quote from a passage in Joel. He is going to say this is what the prophet Joel said. There are those who come along and say this is an exact fulfilment of what Joel prophesied and that this is what Peter said. That means that Peter is interpreting Joel allegorically and we don't need to interpret these passages, these prophecies, from a literal sense. So they end up saying that this was indeed the fulfilment of Joel chapter two, and so Joel chapter two indicates the arrival of the kingdom because that is what Joel two is talking about that happens after the day of the Lord when the kingdom is established. And since it is not a kingdom that is on the earth it must be a spiritual kingdom, and so the kingdom is not spiritual. We call people who believe that amillennialists; they don't believe in a literal, physical earthly 1000-year rule of Christ on the earth. One of the central ways that they get to this is because of the way they try to understand what Peter meant by "This is what the prophet Joel said." So when they interpret this in a strict fulfilment sense they end up using it to support an allegorical interpretation. It isn't a strict literal fulfilment, but if it was then they would be justified in saying that this is allegorical.
In the same way there is the development of a new form of dispensationalism that really isn't dispensationalism. It came out of Dallas Seminary in the mid-1980s and it became known as progressive dispensationalism. The reason they called it progressive is because their idea was that when Jesus offered the kingdom and it was rejected the kingdom was actually inaugurated on the day of Pentecost, but it is not fully inaugurated; it comes in but is not fully here. The view was called the already-not-yet view. Once you make this shift because of the way you interpret what Peter said—this is what Joel said—it opens the door to a number of other things. For example, the Vineyard movement of John Wember and some others.
Peter's use of Joel is application. Nothing that Joel says happens in Acts chapter two, and nothing that happens in Acts chapter two is prophesied in Joel chapter two.
Acts 2:17 NASB 'AND IT SHALL BE IN THE LAST DAYS,' God says, 'THAT I WILL POUR FORTH OF MY SPIRIT ON ALL MANKIND; AND YOUR SONS AND YOUR DAUGHTERS SHALL PROPHESY, AND YOUR YOUNG MEN SHALL SEE VISIONS, AND YOUR OLD MEN SHALL DREAM DREAMS;
When we look at this comparison and contrast Joel chapter two talks about the fact that sons and daughters will prophecy, young men see visions, old men dream dreams, slaves will dream dreams, the Spirit of prophecy will be poured out upon them, there will be wonders in the sky, the sun will turn to darkness, the moon into blood, but there is no mention of tongues. In Acts chapter two there is no mention of prophecy, no daughters speak, no visions, no dreams, only the twelve speak (all men), there are no wonders in the sky or earth, the sun doesn't turn to darkness, the moon doesn't turn to blood, and the only thing mentioned is that they speak in tongues. So Joel chapter two cannot be literally fulfilled by Acts chapter two. What Peter is doing is saying that this is like what Joel said. It is not identical, not a direct fulfilment like Micah 5:2 in Matthew chapter two, but it is showing something similar, a similar pattern. A standard approach at that time would be that if you wanted to make a point you would quote the passage so you would get the context and then you would just draw out the one point that you were making.
If we look at the context of Joel chapter two we see something that is important to understand. Joel 2:1-11 talks about the day of the Lord. Then there is a shift that occurs in verse 12 and the focus is on the response to the day of the Lord. The day of the Lord is a term that refers to a time of judgment that will come upon Israel when God will bring this horrendous judgment upon the people.
Joel 2:1 NASB "Blow a trumpet in Zion, And sound an alarm on My holy mountain! Let all the inhabitants of the land tremble, For the day of the LORD is coming; Surely it is near,
Then when we come to the end, Joel 2:11 NASB "The LORD utters His voice before His army; Surely His camp is very great, For strong is he who carries out His word. The day of the LORD is indeed great and very awesome, And who can endure it?" It ends with a question. We are told who can endure it in the next section. It is those who turn to God. [12] "Yet even now," declares the LORD, "Return [shub] to Me with all your heart, And with fasting, weeping and mourning; [13] And rend your heart and not your garments." Now return [shub] to the LORD your God, For He is gracious and compassionate, Slow to anger, abounding in lovingkindness And relenting of evil." This word shub or return or repent has great significance in Old Testament theology. In Deuteronomy 28:29 there is the warning of future judgments upon the Jews in the land because of the disobedience and idolatry, and that God will remove them and scatter them throughout all the nations. But then comes the promise that when they return to the Lord their God and obey His voice He will restore them from all the lands where He has scattered them. This word "return" to the Lord is the word shub. So what Joel 2:12, 13 is referring to is when this shub event takes place at the end of the day of the Lord. Then the Lord will come and destroy the enemies of Israel.
Following the day of the Lord the land will be refreshed. Joel 2:18 NASB "Then the LORD will be zealous for His land And will have pity on His people. [19] The LORD will answer and say to His people, 'Behold, I am going to send you grain, new wine and oil, And you will be satisfied {in full} with them; And I will never again make you a reproach among the nations.'" Are the Jews a reproach among the nations today? Just read the news. Everybody hates them. They are still a reproach among the nations, so this hasn't been fulfilled yet. [20] "But I will remove the northern {army} far from you, And I will drive it into a parched and desolate land, And its vanguard into the eastern sea, And its rear guard into the western sea. And its stench will arise and its foul smell will come up, For it has done great things."
Joel 2:28 NASB "It will come about after this…" After what? After the day of the Lord. The day of the Lord is the Tribulation, Jeremiah 30:8, the time of Jacob's trouble. "…That I will pour out My Spirit on all mankind; And your sons and daughters will prophesy, Your old men will dream dreams, Your young men will see visions.
The other thing that we see happen here is this pouring out of the Holy Spirit, and that connects to passages such as Ezekiel 36:26, 27 which is the fulfilment of the New covenant. "Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.